A detection engine is not allowed to fall over, nor to raise three times more alerts than a team can handle. Between what the regulator demands and what analysts can review in a day, there is a technical chain to build: rules translated from the text, processing that holds the daily volume, deployments traceable for audit.
Banking and finance
If two of these sentences get said in your organisation, the problem is no longer technical: it is organisational.
With compliance in the room, not from a summary. Every rule is written down with its source, because the auditor will ask where it came from.
Partitioning, optimisation of the critical jobs, headroom for peaks. An engine that takes an hour too long every night ends up covering the next day.
Separated environments, versioned bundles, deployment through an interface. Knowing which version runs in production is not a luxury: it is what an audit asks for.
Reusable components, technical and functional documentation, handover to internal teams. A regulatory system that depends on one person is already a risk.
Each line is a real engagement, with what was measured at the end. Where there is no figure, nothing was measured: we do not invent one.
Anti-money-laundering alert engine built from scratch, as part of integrating a subsidiary, with separated environments and no native versioning.
Around a hundred alerts a day worked by compliance analysts, a critical job cut from one hour to thirteen minutes, and a piece of work quoted at twenty days by the vendor delivered in three: about €41,000 saved.
Continuity of support and maintenance on the anti-money-laundering software, during a prolonged staffing shortage.
Regulatory processing kept stable, incidents resolved within controlled timeframes, and documentation consolidated for the team.
A living catalogue, classified data, and access rules that survive an audit.
See the subjectOne foundation for reporting, big data and models, with autonomous teams on top of it.
See the subjectReports nobody opens, an obsolete platform, and teams quietly going back to Excel.
See the subjectGo-live never fails because of the software: it fails because of the data poured into it.
See the subjectThe technical foundation is delivered, and the end user still has nothing they can use.
See the subjectThirty minutes to lay out the subject and tell you frankly whether it is one for us. You leave with an opinion, whether you sign or not.
Book a slot30 minutes · no commitment